ISO
Click on the red underlined text to get to the source
... 10646].
As ISO 10646 specifies too little about how text is visualized, to
practically use ISO 10646, it is necessary to restrict the standard
...
... As ISO 10646 specifies too little about how text is visualized, to
practically use ISO 10646, it is necessary to restrict the standard
minimally and then add some amount of profiling information.
...
... minimally and then add some amount of profiling information.
For ISO 2022 [ISO2022] based national standards, sufficient profiling
information is provided by national standardization bodies, but, for
...
... ISO2022] based national standards, sufficient profiling
information is provided by national standardization bodies, but, for
ISO 10646, such a profiling is not yet provided.
As the profiling of ISO 10646 ...
... ISO 10646, such a profiling is not yet provided.
As the profiling of ISO 10646 largely affects which character or
combination of characters could be properly displayed, changes of
profiling of ISO 10646 ...
... ISO 10646 largely affects which character or
combination of characters could be properly displayed, changes of
profiling of ISO 10646 are as significant as additions of new
character sets of ISO ...
... ISO 10646 are as significant as additions of new
character sets of ISO 2022.
That is, it's impractical to support the entirety of ISO 10646 ...
... ISO 2022.
That is, it's impractical to support the entirety of ISO 10646 (new
restriction or profiling can always be added), so a client needs to
...
... can decide whether to display the body part. Thus, it is necessary to
provide multiple charset names to each variation of ISO 10646.
For example, in Japan with Japanese windows NT, only those Han
...
... pattern is commonly provided.
The other problem of ISO 10646 for Han characters is that, to display
them in quality required for daily plain text processing in
China/Japan/Korea, it is necessary to add profiling information on
...
... which one of Chinese/Japanese/Korean the text is using. It should be
noted that this feature makes multilingual mixed
Chinese/Japanese/Korean text with ISO 10646 impractical.
Also, just as [RFC1521 ...
... Also, just as [RFC1521] was unclear about how bi-directionality
should be supported with "ISO-8859-6" and "ISO-8859-8" which was
corrected by [RFC1556 ...
... RFC1521] was unclear about how bi-directionality
should be supported with "ISO-8859-6" and "ISO-8859-8" which was
corrected by [RFC1556], it is also unclear how bi-directionality
...
... corrected by [RFC1556], it is also unclear how bi-directionality
could be supported with ISO 10646. There are too much ways to
support bi- directionality. So, until some bi-directionality
mechanism(s) becomes widely supported, it is necessary to exclude
...
... characters for languages which requires bi-directionality support
from the minimal variation. It should be noted that, though ISO
10646 is intended to be free from long term states, save for some
profiling information, introduction of bi-directionality with ISO
10646 do requires the long term states.
...
... from the minimal variation. It should be noted that, though ISO
10646 is intended to be free from long term states, save for some
profiling information, introduction of bi-directionality with ISO
10646 do requires the long term states.
Combining characters also cause problems. In many countries where
...
... such restriction, the result of combination is completely meaningless
which is the current state of ISO 10646. That is, if some
combination is allowed in some implementation while the other does
not support it, communication between them is difficult unless ISO
10646 ...
... ISO 10646. That is, if some
combination is allowed in some implementation while the other does
not support it, communication between them is difficult unless ISO
10646 is profiled to be least common set of widely supported
combinations. So, again, until combination restriction will be
developed for each language ...
...
According to those considerations, this memo defines two variations
of ISO 10646. They are "ISO-10646" as the minimal basic variation and
"ISO-10646 ...
... According to those considerations, this memo defines two variations
of ISO 10646. They are "ISO-10646" as the minimal basic variation and
"ISO-10646-J-1" as the variation which could be useful in Japan.
...
... ISO 10646. They are "ISO-10646" as the minimal basic variation and
"ISO-10646-J-1" as the variation which could be useful in Japan.
Finally, this memo, by no means, promotes the use of ISO 10646 ...
... ISO-10646-J-1" as the variation which could be useful in Japan.
Finally, this memo, by no means, promotes the use of ISO 10646 on the
Internet. It's use is strongly discouraged, when there are other
...
... Internet. It's use is strongly discouraged, when there are other
charsets which can encode the same information, Families of ISO 10646
based charsets, like ISO ...
... ISO 10646
based charsets, like ISO 2022 based charsets, only forms set of
mutually incompatible encoding ...
... charsets, only forms set of
mutually incompatible encoding systems and, unlike ISO 2022 based
charsets [2022INT ...
... Description of "ISO-10646" ...
...
ISO-10646 is profiled to be the most basic part of the family of
encodings based on ISO 10646 ...
... ISO-10646 is profiled to be the most basic part of the family of
encodings based on ISO 10646 and contains the following minimal
graphic characters:
...
... C0 and C1 control characters may also be used as specified in the
section 16 of ISO 10646.
The text with "ISO-10646 ...
... 16 bit big endian form.
As no combining characters are included, "ISO-10646" can be used with
applications at implementation level 1.
...
... encoding is implemented by Windows/NT.
For practical communication, use of "ISO-10646" is discouraged.
"ISO-8859-1" [RFC1345 ...
... For practical communication, use of "ISO-10646" is discouraged.
"ISO-8859-1" [RFC1345] should be used instead.
...
... Description of "ISO-10646-J-1" ...
... C0 and C1 control characters may also be used as specified in the
section 16 of ISO 10646.
The text with "ISO-10646 ...
...
Shapes of Han characters should be of Japanese Han, that is, those of
column "J" in section 26 of ISO 10646.
As no combining characters are included, "ISO-10646 ...
... ISO 10646.
As no combining characters are included, "ISO-10646-J-1" can be used
with applications at implementation level 1.
...
... should be used.
For practical communication, use of "ISO-10646-J-1" is discouraged.
ISO-2022-JP" [2022JP ...
... For practical communication, use of "ISO-10646-J-1" is discouraged.
ISO-2022-JP" [2022JP] should be used instead.
...
... character encoding methods described in this
memo are, respectively, "ISO-10646" and "ISO-10646-J-1". This name
is intended to be used in MIME messages ...
... methods described in this
memo are, respectively, "ISO-10646" and "ISO-10646-J-1". This name
is intended to be used in MIME messages as follows:
...
... International Organization for Standardization (ISO), "Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS)", International Standard, Ref. No. ISO/IEC ...
... ISO), "Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS)", International Standard, Ref. No. ISO/IEC 10646-1:1993 (E). ...
... International Organization for Standardization (ISO), "Information processing -- ISO 7-bit and 8-bit ...
... International Organization for Standardization (ISO), "Information processing -- ISO 7-bit and 8-bit coded character sets ...
... 7-bit and 8-bit coded character sets -- Code extension techniques", International Standard, Ref. No. ISO 2022-1986 (E). ...