RFC 2008:Implications of Various Address Allocatio...
RFC-Ref

Provider


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... subnet basis. Likewise, a router within a provider need not keep detailed routing information about individual subnets ...
... subscriber basis. Moreover, a router within a provider need not keep detailed routing information about stub (single home) subscribers ...
... subscribers of other providers by maintaining routing information on a per provider basis. ...
... aggregation. Also, when a site uses addresses obtain from its provider, but then later switches to a different provider ...
... provider, but then later switches to a different provider (while continuing to use the same addresses), the route ...


... policy by an Internet Registry that is not associated with a provider. ...
... address lending" policy is used by an Internet Registry associated with a provider, the provider is responsible for arranging aggregation ...
... by an Internet Registry associated with a provider, the provider is responsible for arranging aggregation of these addresses ...
... address lending" policy is used by an Internet Registry associated with a provider, the terms and conditions of the loan would be coupled to the service agreement ...
... service agreement between the provider and the subscribers. That is, if the subscriber ...
... subscribers. That is, if the subscriber moves to another provider, the loan would be canceled. ...
... grace period. This provision would allow a subscriber that disconnects from its provider a certain grace period after the disconnection. During this grace period ...
... subscriber borrows its addresses from its provider's block, then the provider can advertise a single address prefix. This reduces the routing information ...
... addresses from its provider's block, then the provider can advertise a single address prefix. This reduces the routing information that needs to be carried ...
... 5.3.1 of RFC1518hist). As the subscriber changes its provider, the loan from the old provider would be returned, and the loan from the new ...
... subscriber changes its provider, the loan from the old provider would be returned, and the loan from the new provider would be established. As a result, the subscriber ...
... from the old provider would be returned, and the loan from the new provider would be established. As a result, the subscriber would renumber to the new addresses ...
... addresses. Once the subscriber renumbers into the new provider's existing blocks, no new routes need to be introduced into the routing system. ...
... Organizations connecting to the Internet should be aware that even if their current provider, and the provider they switch to in the future ...
... Internet should be aware that even if their current provider, and the provider they switch to in the future do not require renumbering, renumbering may still be needed to ...
... IP connectivity. For example, an organization may now receive Internet service from some provider and allocate its addresses out of the CIDR ...
... addresses out of the CIDR block associated with the provider. Later the organization may switch to another provider ...
... provider. Later the organization may switch to another provider. The previous provider may still be willing to allow the organization to retain ...
... switch to another provider. The previous provider may still be willing to allow the organization to retain part of the provider's CIDR ...
... provider may still be willing to allow the organization to retain part of the provider's CIDR block, and accept a more specific prefix ...
... CIDR block, and accept a more specific prefix for that organization from the new provider. Likewise, the new provider may be willing to accept that organization without ...
... for that organization from the new provider. Likewise, the new provider may be willing to accept that organization without renumbering and advertise the more specific prefix (that covers ...
... However, if one or more other providers exist, that are unwilling or unable to accept the longer prefix advertised by the new provider, then the organization would not have IP connectivity to part of the ...
... The above shows that the absence of an explicit "address lending" policy from a current provider in no way ensures that renumbering will not be required in the future when changing providers. Organizations should be aware of this fact should they encounter a ...
... will not be required in the future when changing providers. Organizations should be aware of this fact should they encounter a provider making claims to the contrary. ...


... the case where the organization takes its addresses out of its direct provider's block and the organization changes its direct provider. This may also apply to the case where the organization takes its ...
... addresses out of its direct provider's block and the organization changes its direct provider. This may also apply to the case where the organization takes its addresses ...
... This may also apply to the case where the organization takes its addresses out of its indirect provider's block, and the organization changes its indirect provider, or the organization's direct provider ...
... addresses out of its indirect provider's block, and the organization changes its indirect provider, or the organization's direct provider changes its provider ...
... provider's block, and the organization changes its indirect provider, or the organization's direct provider changes its provider. ...
... provider, or the organization's direct provider changes its provider. ...
... IP connectivity (e.g., with all the subscribers of its direct provider) by limiting the distribution scope of its routing information to its direct provider ...
... provider) by limiting the distribution scope of its routing information to its direct provider. Connectivity to the rest of the Internet can be handled by mediating gateways ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref