RFC 2026:The Internet Standards Process -- Revisio...
RFC-Ref

Proposed Standard


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... Draft Standard level may be referenced by an AS at the Proposed Standard or Draft Standard level, but not by an AS at ...


... Internet Standards evolve through a set of maturity levels known as the "standards track". These maturity levels -- "Proposed Standard", "Draft Standard", and "Standard" -- are defined and discussed in section 4.1. The way in ...
... Proposed Standard ...
... The entry-level maturity for the standards track is "Proposed Standard". A specific action by the IESG is required to move a specification onto the standards track at the "Proposed Standard ...
... Proposed Standard". A specific action by the IESG is required to move a specification onto the standards track at the "Proposed Standard" level. ...
... A Proposed Standard specification is generally stable, has resolved known design choices, is believed to be well-understood, has received significant community review, and appears to enjoy enough community ...
... Usually, neither implementation nor operational experience is required for the designation of a specification as a Proposed Standard. However, such experience is highly desirable, and will usually represent a strong argument in favor of a Proposed Standard ...
... required for the designation of a specification as a Proposed Standard. However, such experience is highly desirable, and will usually represent a strong argument in favor of a Proposed Standard designation. ...
... The IESG may require implementation and/or operational experience prior to granting Proposed Standard status to a specification that materially affects the core Internet protocols or that specifies ...
... A Proposed Standard should have no known technical omissions with respect to the requirements placed upon it. However, the IESG ...
... waive this requirement in order to allow a specification to advance to the Proposed Standard state when it is considered to be useful and necessary (and timely) even with known technical omissions. ...


... A specification shall remain at the Proposed Standard level for at least six (6) months. ...


... verify that the terms for use are reasonable. If the two unrelated implementations of the specification that are required to advance from Proposed Standard to Draft Standard have been produced by different organizations or individuals or if the "significant ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref