RFC 2046:Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions ...
RFC-Ref

header field


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... The first document in this set, RFC 2045draft, defines a number of header fields, including Content-Type. The Content-Type field is used to ...
... media types. After the type and subtype names, the remainder of the header field is simply a set of parameters, specified in an attribute/value notation. The ordering of parameters is not significant. ...
... MIME's Content-Type header field and media type mechanism has been carefully designed to be extensible, and it is expected that the set ...


... and such characters are used in the body, a Content-Transfer-Encoding header field and a corresponding encoding on the data are required in order to transmit the body via some mail transfer protocols, such as ...
... media type parameter in the Content-Type header field. "US-ASCII" does not indicate an arbitrary 7-bit ...
... were to be written to a file. This has been deprecated in anticipation of a separate Content-Disposition header field, to be defined in a subsequent RFC. ...


... actually being an RFC 822std11(-> 2822prop) message. To begin with, NO header fields are actually required in body parts. A body part that starts with a ...
... The only header fields that have defined meaning for body parts are those the names of which begin with "Content-". All other header fields may be ignored in body parts. Although they should generally ...
... The only header fields that have defined meaning for body parts are those the names of which begin with "Content-". All other header fields may be ignored in body parts. Although they should generally be retained if at all possible, they may be discarded by gateways if ...
... with its own "Content-Type: image/jpeg" header field. The use of similar syntax facilitates the conversion of messages to body parts, and vice versa, but the distinction between the two must be ...
... 8bit", or "binary" is permitted for entities of type "multipart". The "multipart" boundary delimiters and header fields are always represented as 7bit US-ASCII in any case (though the header fields ...
... header fields are always represented as 7bit US-ASCII in any case (though the header fields may encode non-US-ASCII header ...
... followed by the boundary parameter value from the Content-Type header field, optional linear whitespace, and a terminating CRLF. ...
... Content-type fields. Thus, a typical "multipart" Content-Type header field might look like this: ...
... linear whitespace. It is then terminated by either another CRLF and the header fields for the next part, or by two CRLFs, in which case there are no header fields for the next part. If no Content-Type ...
... the header fields for the next part, or by two CRLFs, in which case there are no header fields for the next part. If no Content-Type field is present it is assumed to be "message/rfc822" in a ...
... BNF is NOT allowed since this BNF does not specify a structured header field. ...
... transport and adequately documented in the Content- Transfer-Encoding header field. However, in no event are headers (either message headers or body part headers ...
... 822std11(-> 2822prop) message. In particular, they frequently add, remove, or reorder header fields. These operations are explicitly forbidden for the encapsulated ...
... US-ASCII in any case, and data within the body can still be encoded, in which case the Content-Transfer-Encoding header field in the encapsulated message will reflect this. Non-US-ASCII text ...
... Thus, the second piece of a 3-piece message may have either of the following header fields: ...
... entity, which may have its own Content-Type header field, and thus may contain any other data type. ...
... All of the header fields from the initial enclosing message, except those that start with "Content-" and ...
... message, except those that start with "Content-" and the specific header fields "Subject", "Message-ID", ...
... The header fields in the enclosed message which start with "Content-", plus the "Subject ...
... Encrypted", and "MIME-Version" fields, must be appended, in order, to the header fields of the new message. Any header fields in the enclosed message ...
... appended, in order, to the header fields of the new message. Any header fields in the enclosed message which do not start with "Content-" (except for the ...
... All of the header fields from the second and any subsequent enclosing messages are discarded by the reassembly process. ...
... Finally, it should be noted that the "Encrypted" header field has been made obsolete by Privacy Enhanced Messaging (PEM ...
... message/external-body" entities MUST include a Content-ID header field to give a unique identifier by which to reference the data. This identifier ...
... multiline, the full command to be sent to a mail server is not included as a parameter in the content-type header field. Instead, it is provided as the "phantom body" when the media type is ...
... request messages that are constructed should contain a clear indication that they were generated automatically (e.g. in a Comments: header field) in an attempt to resolve a MIME "message/external-body ...


... specification of alternate character sets. Additional optional header fields provide mechanisms for certain extensions deemed desirable by many implementors. Finally, a number of useful media types ...


... <"message" as defined in RFC 822std11(-> 2822prop), with all header fields optional, not starting with the specified dash-boundary, and with the delimiter not occurring anywhere in the body part. Note that the semantics of a part differ from the semantics ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref