registration
Click on the red underlined text to get to the source
... charsets. This in turn means that the ability to label different
charsets is essential. This registration procedure exists solely to
associate a specific name or names with a given charset and to give
...
... charset is a protocol issue,
not a registration issue, and is not dealt with by this registration
procedure.
...
... protocol issue,
not a registration issue, and is not dealt with by this registration
procedure.
...
... Registration Requirements ...
... CCS and CES they are based on in their
registration or else cite a definition of their CCS and CES that
...
... All registered charsets MUST be specified in a stable, openly
available specification. Registration of charsets whose
specifications aren't stable and openly available is forbidden.
...
...
This registration mechanism is not intended to be a vehicle for the
definition of entirely new charsets. This is due to the fact that the
...
... definition of entirely new charsets. This is due to the fact that the
registration process does NOT contain adequate review mechanisims for
such undertakings.
...
... Charsets must function as actual charsets: Registration of things
that are better thought of as a transfer encoding, as a media type ...
...
Charset registrations can be published in RFCs, however, RFC
publication is not required to register a new charset ...
... charset.
The registration of a charset does not imply endorsement, approval,
or recommendation by the IANA ...
... Registration Procedure ...
... established for the sole purpose of reviewing proposed charset
registrations. Proposed charsets are not formally registered and must
not be used; the "x-" prefix ...
... prefix specified in RFC 2045draft can be used until
registration is complete.
The intent of the public posting is to solicit comments and feedback
...
...
When the two week period has passed and the registration proposer is
convinced that consensus has been achieved, the registration
...
... When the two week period has passed and the registration proposer is
convinced that consensus has been achieved, the registration
application should be submitted to IANA and the charset ...
... charset reviewer, who is appointed by the IETF Applications Area
Director(s), either approves the request for registration or rejects
it. Rejection may occur because of significant objections raised on
the list or objections raised externally. If the charset ...
... the list or objections raised externally. If the charset reviewer
considers the registration sufficiently important and controversial,
a last call for comments may be issued to the full IETF. The charset ...
...
reviewer may also recommend standards track processing (before or
after registration) when that appears appropriate and the level of
specification of the charset is adequate.
...
... IANA Registration ...
...
Provided that the charset registration has either passed review or
has been successfully appealed to the IESG, the IANA ...
... register
the charset, assign a MIBenum value, and make its registration
available to the community.
...
...
Charset registrations will be posted in the anonymous FTP file
"ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets ...
... Registration Template ...
...
This registration procedure is not known to raise any sort of
security considerations that are appreciably different from those
...
... Freed, N., Klensin, J., and J. Postel, "Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) Part Four: Registration Procedures", RFC 2048(-> 4289 | 4288), November 1996. ...
