RFC 2379:RSVP over ATM Implementation Guidelines
RFC-Ref

RSVP


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... are used to support QoS flows and RSVP is used as the internet level QoS signaling protocol ...
... IP over ATM. The general issues related to running RSVP[4] over ATM have been covered in several papers ...
... interoperability between different implementations. Requirements for RSVP over ATM implementations are provided in [2]. ...


... This section provides implementation guidelines for implementation of RSVP over ATM. Several recommendations are common for all, RSVP ...
... RSVP over ATM. Several recommendations are common for all, RSVP sessions, both unicast and multicast ...
... RSVP Message VC Usage ...
... The general issues related to which VC should be used for RSVP messages is covered in [6]. It discussed several implementation options including: mixed control and data, single control VC ...
... RSVP over ATM implementations SHOULD send RSVP control (messages) ...
... RSVP over ATM implementations SHOULD send RSVP control (messages) over the best effort data path, see figure 1. It is permissible to allow a user to override this behavior. The stated approach ...
... VC requirements since the best effort data path will need to exist in order for RSVP sessions to be established and in order for RSVP ...
... RSVP sessions to be established and in order for RSVP reservations to be initiated. The specific best effort paths that will be used by RSVP are: for unicast ...
... for RSVP reservations to be initiated. The specific best effort paths that will be used by RSVP are: for unicast, the same VC used to ...
... || || RSVP Control Messages ...
... Control Messages Figure 1: RSVP Control Message VC Usage ...
... VCs may not provide the reliability that RSVP needs. However the best effort path is expected to satisfy RSVP reliability ...
... reliability that RSVP needs. However the best effort path is expected to satisfy RSVP reliability requirements in most ...
... requirements in most networks. Especially since RSVP allows for a certain amount of packet loss without any loss of state synchronization. ...
... As discussed in [6], data associated with multiple RSVP sessions can be sent using the same shared VCs ...
... VCs. Implementation of such "aggregation" models is still a matter for research. Therefore, RSVP over ATM implementations SHOULD use independent VCs ...
... over ATM implementations SHOULD use independent VCs for each RSVP reservation. ...
... been defined in [7] and [1]. The ability for short-cuts and RSVP to interoperate has been raised as a general question. The area of concern is the ability to handle asymmetric short-cuts. Specifically ...
... interoperate has been raised as a general question. The area of concern is the ability to handle asymmetric short-cuts. Specifically how RSVP can handle the case where a downstream short-cut may not have a matching upstream ...
... Path Figure 2: Asymmetric RSVP Message Forwarding With ATM Short-Cuts ...
... Examination of RSVP shows that the protocol already includes mechanisms that allows support of the asymmetric paths. The mechanism is the same one used to support RESV messages ...
... the wrong router and the wrong interface. RSVP messages are only processed when they arrive at the proper interface. When messages ...
... interface. When messages arrive on the wrong interface, they are forwarded by RSVP. The proper interface is indicated in the NHOP object of the message. So, ...
... proper interface is indicated in the NHOP object of the message. So, existing RSVP mechanisms will support the asymmetric paths that can occur when using short-cuts. ...
... The short-cut model of VC establishment still poses several issues when running with RSVP. The major issues are dealing with established best effort short-cuts, when to establish short-cuts, and QoS only ...
... best effort short-cuts, when to establish short-cuts, and QoS only short-cuts. These issues will need to be addressed by RSVP implementations. ...
... The key issue to be addressed by RSVP over ATM implementations is when to establish a short-cut for a QoS ...
... when to establish a short-cut for a QoS data flow. RSVP over ATM implementations SHOULD simply follow best effort traffic ...
... end-point SHOULD be used when setting up RSVP triggered VCs for QoS traffic ...
... PATH messages are forwarded over the best effort short-cut. Note that in this approach, when best effort short-cuts are never established, RSVP triggered QoS short-cuts will also never be established. ...
... Heterogeneous sessions can only occur with multicast RSVP sessions. The issues relating to data VC ...


... Berger, L., "RSVP over ATM Implementation Requirements", RFC 2380prop ...
... Braden, R., Zhang, L., Berson, S., Herzog, S., and S. Jamin, "Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1 Functional Specification", RFC 2205prop ...
... Crawley, E., Berger, L., Berson, S., Baker, F., Borden, M., and J. Krawczyk, "A Framework for Integrated Services and RSVP over ATM", RFC 2382, August 1998. ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref