RFC 2824:Call Processing Language Framework and Re...
RFC-Ref

Call Processing Language


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... language. We call this language a call processing language. The development of this document has been substantially informed by ...
... The development of this document has been substantially informed by the development of a particular call processing language, as described in [5]. In general, when this document refers to "a call processing language ...
... call processing language, as described in [5]. In general, when this document refers to "a call processing language," it is referring to a generic language that fills this role ...
... language that fills this role; "the call processing language" or "the CPL" refers to this particular language ...


... CPL: A Call Processing Language, a simple language to describe how Internet telephony ...


... The Call Processing Language operates on a generalized model of an Internet telephony network ...
... In the Call Processing Language's network model, an Internet telephony network ...


... Creation and transport of a call processing language script ...
... Users create call processing language scripts, typically on end devices, and transmit them through the network to signalling servers. ...


... more requested features produce ambiguous or conflicting behavior [8]. Feature interaction issues for features implemented with a call processing language can be roughly divided into three categories: feature-to-feature in one server, script-to-script in one server, and server-to-server. ...
... Due to the explicit nature of event conditions discussed in the previous section, feature-to-feature interaction is not likely to be a problem in a call processing language environment. Whereas a subscriber to traditional telephone ...
... class of server-to-server interactions are best resolved by the underlying signalling protocol, since they can arise whether the signalling servers are being controlled by a call processing language or by some entirely different means. One example of this is forwarding loops, where user X may have calls forwarded to Y, who has ...
... calls forwarded back to X. SIP has a mechanism to detect such loops. A call processing language server thus does not need to define any special mechanisms to prevent such occurrences; it should, however, be possible to trigger a different set of call processing ...


... This section lists those properties of a call processing language which we believe to be necessary to have in order to implement the motivating examples, in line with the described architecture ...
... These are some abstract attributes which any proposed call processing language should possess. o Light-weight, efficient, easy to implement ...
... To be useful, a call processing language obviously should be able to react to and initiate call signalling events. ...
... A number of other features that a call processing language should have do not refer to call signalling per se; however, they are still extremely desirable to implement many useful features. ...
... encryption is very useful. The specification of this mechanism can be (and probably ought to be) a separate specification from that of the call processing language itself. ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref