RFC 3160:The Tao of IETF - A Novice's Guide to the...
RFC-Ref

group


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... The Internet Engineering Task Force is a loosely self-organized group of people who contribute to the engineering and evolution of Internet ...
... Making recommendations to the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) regarding the standardization of protocols and protocol ...
... IETF member is being on the IETF or Working Group mailing lists (see Section 1.3). This is where the best information about current IETF ...
... October, 1986, was the first that non-government vendors attended. The concept of Working Groups was introduced at the 5th IETF meeting at the NASA Ames Research Center in California in February, 1987. ...
... ways that ISOC does this is through financial and legal support of the other "I" groups described here, particularly the IETF. ISOC's ...
... IETF process, and acts as a public relations channel for the times that one of the "I" groups wants to say something to the press. The ISOC is one of the major ...
... IESG (Internet Engineering Steering Group) ...
... The IESG ratifies or corrects the output from the IETF's Working Groups, gets WGs started and finished, and makes sure that non-WG drafts that are about to become RFCs are correct. ...
... IESG never wields power. When the IESG sees a Working Group veering from its charter, or when a WG asks the IESG ...
... quality of the IETF standards comes both from the review they get in the Working Groups and the review that the WG review gets from the ADs. ...
... WG is that the result did not really gain consensus in the IETF as a whole, that is, among all of the Working Groups in all areas. For instance, the result of one WG might clash with a technology developed in a different Working Group ...
... Working Groups in all areas. For instance, the result of one WG might clash with a technology developed in a different Working Group. An important job of the IESG is to watch over the output of all the WGs ...
... IAB members pay special attention to emerging activities in the IETF. When a new IETF working group is proposed, the IAB reviews its charter for architectural consistency ...
... consistency and integrity. Even before the group is chartered, the IAB members are more than willing to discuss new ideas with the people proposing them. ...
... "ietf@ietf.org". This is where discussions of cosmic significance are held (Working Groups have their own mailing lists for discussions ...


... additional funds for things like the multicast simulcast of some Working Group sessions. ...
... blue - Working Group/BOF chair ...
... chair green - Host group red - IAB member ...
... conversations with people who wear these dots. If the IAB and IESG members and Working Group and BOF chairs didn't want to talk to ...
... Assignments for breakout rooms (where the Working Groups and BOFs meet) and a map showing the room locations are also shown on the agenda. Room assignments can change as the agenda changes. Some ...
... meet) and a map showing the room locations are also shown on the agenda. Room assignments can change as the agenda changes. Some Working Groups meet multiple times during a meeting and every attempt is made to have a Working Group meet in the same room for each ...
... Working Groups meet multiple times during a meeting and every attempt is made to have a Working Group meet in the same room for each session. ...
... the Internet industry next year. You can safely assume that going to Working Group meetings will confuse you more than it will help you understand what is happening, or will be happening, in the industry. ...
... IETF. As these people read the current Internet Drafts and the traffic on the relevant Working Group lists, they will get a sense of whether or not their presence would be worthwhile for your company ...
... get a sense of whether or not their presence would be worthwhile for your company or for the Working Groups. ...
... the very latest hardware and software, and you are following the relevant Working Groups in your copious free time, you might find attending the IETF meeting valuable. The closer you are to the ...
... IETF, employees of vendors are the ones writing the protocols and leading the Working Groups, so it's completely appropriate for vendors to attend. If you create ...
... everyone from a technical department to go, particularly if they are not all reading the Internet Drafts and following the Working Group mailing lists. Many companies ...
... protocols. Professors and grad students (and sometimes overachieving undergrads) who are doing research in networking or communications can get a wealth of information by following Working Groups in their specific fields of interest. Wandering into different Working Group ...
... can get a wealth of information by following Working Groups in their specific fields of interest. Wandering into different Working Group meetings can have the same effect as going to symposia and seminars in your department. ...
... IETF. Each volume of contains the final (hindsight) agenda, an IETF overview, area and Working Group reports, and slides from the protocol and technical presentations. The Working Group reports and ...
... overview, area and Working Group reports, and slides from the protocol and technical presentations. The Working Group reports and presentations are sometimes incomplete, if the materials haven't been turned in to the Secretariat in time for publication. ...
... registration desk. This desk is used to make appropriate information available to the attendees (e.g., copies of something discussed in a Working Group session, descriptions of online IETF-related ...


... Working Groups ...
... The vast majority of the IETF's work is done in many "Working Groups;" at the time of this writing, there are about 115 different WGs. (The term "Working Group ...
... Working Groups;" at the time of this writing, there are about 115 different WGs. (The term "Working Group" is often seen capitalized, but probably not for a very good reason.) BCP 25(RFC-2418 ...
... probably not for a very good reason.) BCP 25(RFC-2418), "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures," is an excellent resource for anyone participating in WG ...
... mailing list post to the mailing list, while others let anyone post. Each Working Group has one or two chairs. ...
... WG is supposed to follow. The charter states the scope of discussion for the Working Group, as well as its goals. The WG's mailing list and face-to-face ...
... all WG charters makes interesting reading for folks who want to know what the different Working Groups are supposed to be doing. ...
... Working Group Chairs ...
... As you can imagine, some Working Group chairs are much better at their jobs than others. When a WG ...
... mailing lists continue on after a WG is closed, still discussing the same topics as the Working Group did.) In the IETF, it is a mark of success that the WG closes ...
... manage to get their WG to finish, or keep adding new tasks to the charter so that the Working Group drags on for many years. The output of these aging WGs is often not nearly as useful as the ...
... WGs is often not nearly as useful as the earlier products, and the messy results are sometimes called "degenerative Working Group syndrome." ...
... chair is to decide which Internet Drafts get published as "official" Working Group drafts, and which don't. In practice, there is actually not much procedural difference between WG drafts ...
... Getting Things Done in a Working Group ...
... Another aspect of Working Groups that confounds many people is the fact that there is no formal voting. The general rule on disputed topics is that the Working Group ...
... Working Groups that confounds many people is the fact that there is no formal voting. The general rule on disputed topics is that the Working Group has to come to "rough consensus," meaning that a very large majority of those who care must agree. The ...
... exact method of determining rough consensus varies from Working Group to Working Group. The lack of voting has caused some very long ...
... rough consensus varies from Working Group to Working Group. The lack of voting has caused some very long delays for some proposals, but most IETF participants who have ...
... rough consensus after acrimonious debates feel that the delays often result in better protocols. (And, if you think about it, how could you have "voting" in a group that anyone can join, and when it's impossible to count the participants?) ...
... Preparing for Working Group Meetings ...
... Internet Drafts and RFCs beforehand. WG meetings are explicitly not for education: they are for developing the group's documents. Even if you do not plan to say anything in the meeting, you should read the group ...
... group's documents. Even if you do not plan to say anything in the meeting, you should read the group's documents before attending so you can understand what is being said. ...
... WG meeting, you may have a hard time booking your flight with such little notice, particularly if the Working Group's meeting changes schedule. Be sure to keep track of the current agenda so you can schedule flights and hotels. But, when it comes down to it, you probably shouldn't be coming for just one WG ...
... meeting. It's likely that your knowledge could be valuable in a few WGs, assuming that you've read the drafts and RFCs for those groups. ...
... Working Group Mailing Lists ...
... mailing lists related to IETF work. For example, every Working Group has its own discussion list. In addition, there are some long-term technical debates that have been ...
... discussions on the mailing lists of the Working Groups that they wish to attend. The more work that is done on the mailing lists, the less ...
... mailing lists, the less work that will need to be done at the meeting, leaving time for cross pollination (i.e., attending Working Groups outside one's primary area of interest in order to broaden one's perspective). ...
... The mailing lists also provide a forum for those who wish to follow, or contribute to, the Working Groups' efforts, but can't attend the IETF meetings. ...
... Interim Working Group Meetings ...
... Working groups sometimes hold interim meetings between IETFs. Interim meetings aren't a substitute for IETF meetings, however -- a ...
... Interim meetings aren't a substitute for IETF meetings, however -- a group can't decide to skip a meeting in a location they're not fond of and meet in Cancun three weeks later, for example. Interim meetings require AD ...
... all participants. Like regular IETF meetings, someone needs to take notes and send them to minutes@ietf.org, and the group needs to take attendance. ...


... In order to form a Working Group, you need a charter and someone who is able to be chair. In order to get those things, you need to get ...
... BOF want to do in the charter. It's important to remember that most BOFs are held in order to get support for an eventual Working Group, not to get support for a particular document. ...


... read before coming to the meeting, stop here -- at least temporarily. Then, on your flight home, read the rest of the Tao. By that time you'll be ready to get actively involved in the Working Groups that interested you at the meeting, and the Tao will get you started on your way. ...


... Area Director to take the draft to the IESG (if it's an individual submission). If the draft is an official Working Group product, the WG chair asks the AD to take it to the IESG ...
... document overviews and topics which are introductory or appeal to a broad audience. Frequently, FYIs are created by groups within the IETF User Services ...
... An Internet Draft can be either a Working Group draft or an individual submission. Working Group drafts are usually reviewed by ...
... Internet Draft can be either a Working Group draft or an individual submission. Working Group drafts are usually reviewed by the chair before being accepted as a WG ...
... version of the draft, the draft editor supplies the filename for the draft. If the draft is an official Working Group product, the name will start with "draft-ietf-" followed by the designation of the WG ...
... WG about creating keys might be named "draft-ietf-smime-keying-00.txt". If it's not the product of a Working Group, the name will start with "draft-" and the last name of one of the authors followed by a descriptive word or two, followed by ...
... "00.txt". For example, a draft that someone named Smith wrote might be named "draft-smith-keying-00.txt". If a draft is an individual submission but relates to a particular working group, the author sometimes follows their name with the name of the working group, such ...
... submission but relates to a particular working group, the author sometimes follows their name with the name of the working group, such as "draft-smith-smime-keying-00.txt". You are welcome to suggest names; however, it is up to the Internet Drafts ...
... there are cases where the filename changes after the first version, such as when a personal effort is pulled into a Working Group. ...
... WG chair sends it to the appropriate Area Director after it has gone through Working Group last call. If the draft is an individual submission, the draft's author or editor submits it to the appropriate Area Director ...
... BCP 9(RFC-2026) also describes the appeals process for people who feel that a Working Group chair, an AD, or the IESG ...
... generally this means a stable standard that anyone can get a copy of (although they might have to pay for it) and that was made by a generally recognized standards group. If the external standard changes, you have to reference the particular instantiation of that standard in your specification, as with a designation of the date of ...
... IPSEC interacts with your protocol, and vice versa. Be sure to check with your Working Group chair if you're not sure how to handle this section in your draft. ...
... IETF documents. They are also useful for specifications that are the precursors for work being done by IETF Working Groups. On the other hand, some people refer to Informational RFCs as "standards" even though the RFCs are not standards, usually to fool the gullible public about something ...


... Read -- Review the Internet Drafts in your area of expertise, and comment on them in the Working Groups. Participate in the discussion in a friendly, helpful ...
... minor if they appear in more software. Report any problems you find with the standards to the appropriate Working Group so that the standard can be clarified in later revisions. One of the oft-quoted tenets of the IETF ...
... a corporate member of ISOC, since this has the greatest financial benefit for the group. It will, of course, also benefit the Internet as a whole. ...


... IETF and Other Standards Groups ...
... considering something when in fact there is just an Internet Draft in a Working Group, and saying that the IETF approved something when all that happened was that an Informational RFC was published. In both ...
... However, IETF meetings are excellent places to meet and speak with document authors and Working Group chairs; this can be quite valuable for reporters who are covering the progress of protocols. ...


... Internet Draft submissions and queries minutes@ietf.org Where to send Working Group minutes proceedings@ietf.org IETF Proceedings Coordinator ...
... web site, http://www.ietf.org, is the best source for information about meetings, Working Groups, Internet Drafts, RFCs, IETF ...
... Internet Draft IESG Internet Engineering Steering Group, http://www.ietf.org/iesg.html ...
... http://www.w3.org/ WG Working Group ...
... 2360) BCP 25 "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures" (RFC-2418) ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref