1 - 3 - 4 - 7 - 8 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W
traffic engineering
Click on the red underlined text to get to the source
... Several of the new features described in this document were motivated
by the requirements for traffic engineering over MPLS (see [3]). In
...
... nodes can be mapped onto the LSP tunnels according to local
policy. Although traffic engineering (that is, performance
optimization of operational networks ...
...
One useful application of explicit routing is traffic engineering.
Using explicitly routed LSPs, a node ...
... LSP tunnels.
This can be useful during reroute operations or to spread a traffic
trunk over multiple paths. In the traffic engineering application
such sets are called traffic engineered tunnels ...
... traffic
trunk over multiple paths. In the traffic engineering application
such sets are called traffic engineered tunnels (TE tunnels ...
... DATA objects contained in Path
messages as input to policy control. For instance, in the traffic
engineering application, it is very useful to use the Path message as
a means of verifying that bandwidth ...
... greater than what is required. This restricts the applicability of
WF for traffic engineering purposes.
Furthermore, because of the merging rules of WF ...
... ROUTE
objects cannot be used with WF reservations. As a result of this
issue and the lack of applicability to traffic engineering, use of WF
is not considered in this document.
...
...
One of the requirements for Traffic Engineering is the capability to
reroute an established TE tunnel under a number of conditions, based
...
... Awduche, D., Malcolm, J., Agogbua, J., O'Dell and J. McManus, "Requirements for Traffic Engineering over MPLS", RFC 2702, September 1999. ...
