1 - 3 - 6 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X
Version 2
Click on the red underlined text to get to the source
... RPC)
application that uses RPC version 2 and the corresponding eXternal
Data Representation (XDR) as defined in [RFC1831 ...
... client needs a filehandle to
initiate communication with the server. With the NFS version 2
protocol [RFC1094] and the NFS ...
... LOOKUP operation in
the NFS version 2 and 3 protocols, it has been demonstrated that the
MOUNT protocol is unnecessary for viable interaction between NFS
...
...
In the NFS version 2 and 3 protocols, there was one type of
filehandle with a single set of semantics. This type of filehandle
...
...
This style of browsing is not well supported by the NFS version 2 and
3 protocols. The client expects all LOOKUP operations ...
... Delegation") two additional rules apply. Note that these rules are
obeyed in practice by many NFS version 2 and version 3 clients.
...
...
In the NFS version 2 protocol, the only reliable way to determine
whether an operation was allowed was to try it and see if it
succeeded or failed. Using the ACCESS operation in the NFS ...
...
With the NFS version 2 and 3 public filehandle, the client is able to
specify whether the path name provided in the LOOKUP ...
... filesystem metadata to stable storage before returning results. This
corresponds to the NFS version 2 protocol semantics. Any other
behavior constitutes a protocol violation. If stable is DATA_SYNC4,
...
... Linn, J., "Generic Security Service Application Program Interface, Version 2, Update 1", RFC 2743prop, January 2000. ...
... Association, Berkeley, CA, Summer 1985. The basic paper describing the SunOS implementation of the NFS version 2 protocol, and discusses the goals, protocol specification and trade- offs. ...