1 - 2 - 6 - 8 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X
deployment
Click on the red underlined text to get to the source
... Section 9 gives an evaluation of the costs and benefits of Quick-
Start, and Section 10 discusses implementation and deployment issues.
The appendices discuss related work, Quick-Start design decisions,
...
... Experimental to Proposed Standard, and will affect the
degree of deployment of Quick-Start while in Experimental mode.
...
... routers,
particularly in the beginning of Quick-Start's deployment in the
Internet. This would mean some extra delay for the end hosts ...
... Implementation and Deployment Issues ...
... This section discusses some of the implementation issues with Quick-
Start. This section also discusses some of the key deployment
issues, such as the chicken-and-egg deployment problems of mechanisms
that have to be deployed in both routers ...
... Start. This section also discusses some of the key deployment
issues, such as the chicken-and-egg deployment problems of mechanisms
that have to be deployed in both routers and end nodes ...
... routers and end nodes in order to
work, and the problems posed by the wide deployment of middleboxes
today that block the use of known or unknown IP Options.
...
... Possible Deployment Scenarios ...
... network paths and the security issues discussed in
Section 11, the most realistic initial deployment of Quick-Start
would most likely take place in intranets ...
...
Quick-Start is not currently intended for ubiquitous deployment in
the global Internet. In particular, Quick-Start ...
... Start would potentially be useful. These are the environments that
might consider an initial deployment of Quick-Start in the routers
...
... In such an environment, Quick-Start would be of benefit to users,
and there would be a clear incentive for the deployment of Quick-
Start in routers ...
... Internet to
date [MAF05], it is disconcerting to note that some of the deployment
problems of Quick-Start are even greater than those of ECN ...
...
However, in spite of these issues, there is some hope for the
deployment of Quick-Start, at least in protected corners of the
Internet ...
... approach of optimistic sending.
(1) Incremental deployment:
One question would be the potential complications of incremental
deployment ...
... deployment:
One question would be the potential complications of incremental
deployment, where some of the routers along the path might not
understand the packet information describing the initial window.
...
... AntiECN, but as powerful or more powerful in terms of the specific
issue of allowing larger initial windows. Also, (we think) it is
more amenable to incremental deployment in the current Internet.
...
... alternately, as a negative step of unnecessarily delaying more
fundamental changes. Without answering this question, we would note
that our own approach tends to favor the incremental deployment of
relatively simple mechanisms, as long as the simple mechanisms are
not short-term hacks, but mechanisms that lead the overall
...
