RFC 4891:Using IPsec to Secure IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnel...
RFC-Ref

traffic


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... security association (SA) is established to protect the traffic defined by (IPv4-source, IPv4-dest, protocol = ...
... tunnel mode, the IPsec SA is established to protect the traffic defined by (IPv6-source, IPv6 ...


... IP as the next layer protocol in traffic selectors when an IPsec SA is negotiated. In ...
... layer protocol (like TCP or UDP) in traffic selectors. 2. [RFC4301 ...
... IKEv1. It is valid to negotiate multiple traffic selectors for a given IPsec SA in [RFC4301 ...
... IKEv1 is used, then multiple SAs need to be set up, one for each traffic selector. Note that the existing implementations based on IKEv1 ...


... IPsec transport mode SA to protect the IPv6 traffic. Several requirements ...
... IPsec is used to protect the IPv6 traffic (inner header) for the scenarios listed in Section 3. ...
... 1. All of IPv6 traffic should be protected, including link-local (e.g., Neighbor Discovery ...
... link-local (e.g., Neighbor Discovery) and multicast traffic. Without this, an attacker can pollute the IPv6 ...
... tunnels, the source and destination addresses of the traffic could come from a wide range of prefixes that are ...
... The IPv6 traffic can be protected using transport or tunnel mode. ...
... this writing, popular in many open source implementations), the SPD entries for protecting all traffic between the two endpoints must be described. Evaluating against the requirements ...
... requirements above, all link-local traffic multicast traffic would need to be identified, possibly resulting in a long list of SPD ...
... link-local traffic multicast traffic would need to be identified, possibly resulting in a long list of SPD entries. The second requirement ...
... SPD entries. The second requirement is difficult to satisfy, because the traffic needing protection is not necessarily (e.g., router-to-router tunnel ...
... IPsec tunnel mode SA is modeled as interface, the traffic that needs protection can be modeled as routes pointing to the interface. ...
... But the second requirement is difficult to satisfy, because the traffic needing protection is not necessarily known a priori. The third requirement ...
... interface. In practice, (2) has been solved by protecting all the traffic (::/0), but no interoperable implementations support this feature. For a detailed list of issues pertaining to this, see [VLINK ...
... tunnel is a much simpler solution and also easily protects link-local and multicast traffic, we do not recommend using tunnel mode in this context ...
... tunnel non-IP traffic. [RFC3884], [RFC3193], and [RFC4023 ...
... applying transport mode to protect tunnel traffic that spans only a part of an end-to-end path. ...
... and protocol value 41 as phase 2 identities. With IKEv2, the traffic selectors are used to carry the same information. ...


... multicast and link-local traffic do not work over such a tunnel. Fragment handling ...
... Manual keying must not be used as large amounts of IPv6 traffic may be carried over the tunnels and doing so would make it easier for an ...


... security to both the protocol for tunnel setup and data traffic. Either IKEv1 ...
... integrity is discouraged. ESP furthermore provides limited traffic flow confidentiality. IPsec ...


... addresses ("::/0 <-> ::/0" ) as IPsec traffic selectors while setting up the SA. Though this allows ...
... setting up the SA. Though this allows all traffic between the two nodes to be protected by IPsec, the ...
... IPsec, the routing table would decide what traffic gets sent over the tunnel. Ingress filtering ...
... SPDs": some implementations do not model the tunnel mode SA as an IP interface. Traffic selection is based on specific SPD entries, e.g., "2001:db8:1::/48 <-> 2001:db8: ...
... pseudo-interface for all IPsec traffic), there is no Duplicate Address Detection (DAD), Multicast Listener Discovery ...
... MLD), or link-local traffic to protect; multicast is not possible over such a tunnel ...
... Ingress filtering is performed automatically by the IPsec traffic selectors. Ingress filtering ...
... IPV6-TEP2 as phase 2 identities. With IKEv2, the traffic selectors are used to carry the same information. ...
... SUBNET. With IKEv2, the traffic selectors are used to carry the same information. ...


... networks. A detailed description of the problem and requirements of IPsec-protected data traffic traversing a NAT is provided in [RFC3715 ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref