RFC 4891:Using IPsec to Secure IPv6-in-IPv4 Tunnel...
RFC-Ref

Tunneling


Click on the red underlined text to get to the source

... working group has selected (manually configured) IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling [RFC4213] as one of the IPv6 transition mechanisms for IPv6 ...
... complete solution is to use IPsec to protect IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling. The document was intentionally not expanded to include the details on how to set up an IPsec-protected ...


... GRE) [RFC4023] and Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP) [RFC3193].) ...


... topology by encapsulating them within IPv4 packets. Tunneling can be used in a variety of ways. .--------. _----_ .--------. ...
... This is a generalization of host-to-router and router-to-host tunneling, because the issues when connecting a whole site (using a router) and connecting a single host ...
... As noted in the Introduction, automatic host-to-host tunneling methods (e.g., 6to4 ...


... L2TP, GRE, and other tunneling methods, especially when the user wants to tunnel non-IP ...


... While this might be an implementation matter for host-to-router tunneling, having a similar entry, "Local=IPV6-PREF/48 & Remote=IPV6- ...
... PREF/48", is critical for site-to-router tunneling. ...


... For IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling, NAT traversal is interesting for two reasons: ...
... tunnel endpoints is often behind a NAT, and configured tunneling, using protocol 41, is not guaranteed to traverse the NAT ...
... tunnel and a tunnel that might not always be possible without other tunneling mechanisms. 2. Using NAT traversal ...
... When NAT is not applied, the second benefit would still be desirable. In particular, using manually configured tunneling is an operational challenge with dynamic IP addresses, because both ends need to be ...



Google
Web
RFC-Ref